Skip to main content

Table 2 Descriptive statistics of the scales included in the study, across age groups: % or mean (SD)

From: Empowerment among adult patients with type 2 diabetes: age differentials in relation to person-centred primary care, community resources, social support and other life-contextual circumstances

 

Age

27–54

Age

55–64

Age

≥ 65

P-value

Scale

 Empowerment (%)

  High (≥ 4)

48.4

57.7

58.4

**

  Low (<  4)

51.6

42.3

41.6

 

Continuity of care (%):

 -Family/regular physician

  No/don’t know

31.5

25.0

24.9

*

  Yes

68.5

75.0

75.1

 

 -Family/regular nurse

  No/don’t know

53.5

50.1

46.2

*

  Yes

46.5

49.9

53.8

 

PACIC (range 1–5)

2.5 (0.9)

2.4 (0.9)

2.2 (0.8)

***

Social support (1–5)

 Community

3.3 (0.9)

3.4 (0.8)

3.5 (0.8)

**

 Family and friends

3.7 (1.1)

3.8 (1.0)

3.9 (0.9)

*

 Peers

3.1 (1.3)

3.2 (1.3)

3.3 (1.2)

ns.

Stress (1–5)

2.0 (0.5)

1.7 (0.5)

1.5 (0.4)

***

Diabetes-related distress (1–4)

2.0 (0.6)

1.8 (0.6)

1.6 (0.5)

***

Energy/vitality (0–100)

52.6 (23.9)

59.6 (22.8)

62.5 (21.5)

***

Emotional well-being (0–100)

65.2 (20.8)

71.8 (19.5)

74.8 (18.3)

***

Diabetes counselling (1–3)

2.5 (0.5)

2.5 (0.5)

2.5 (0.5)

ns.

  1. Chi2-test for categorical variables and One-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables
  2. P-value for statistical significance between age groups: *** p ≤ .001; ** p < .01; * p < .05; ns. non-significant