Skip to main content

Table 5 Quality assessment

From: The effectiveness of graphic health warnings on tobacco products: a systematic review on perceived harm and quit intentions

No.

Author(s), publication year

Risk of bias arising from the randomization process

Risk of bias due to deviations from the intended interventions (effect of assignment to intervention)

Risk of bias due to missing outcomes data

Risk of bias in measurement of the outcome

Risk of bias in selection of the reported result

Overall risk of bias

3

Brewer et al., 2016

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

4

Brewer et al., 2019

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

8

Fathelrahman et al., 2010

Low

Some concerns

Low

Low

Low

Some concerns

10

Glock & Kneer, 2009

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

15

Hall et al., 2018

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

23

McQueen et al., 2015

High

Low

Low

Low

Low

High

28

Parada et al., 2017

Low

Low

Some concerns

Low

Low

Some concerns

30

Popova & Ling, 2014

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

31

Schneider et al., 2012

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

  1. RoB2