Skip to main content

Table 4 Quality assessment

From: The effectiveness of graphic health warnings on tobacco products: a systematic review on perceived harm and quit intentions

No.

Author(s), publication year

Risk of bias due to confounding

Risk of bias in selection of participants

Risk of bias in classification of interventions

Risk of bias due to deviations from intended intervention

Risk of bias due to missing data

Risk of bias in measurement of outcomes

Risk of bias in selection of the reported result

Overall

1

Anshari et al., 2018

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Low

Low

Moderate

Low

Moderate

2

Borland et al., 2009

Moderate

Low

Moderate

Low

Low

Moderate

Low

Moderate

5

Cho et al., 2018

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Low

Low

Moderate

Low

Moderate

6

Durkin et al., 2015

Moderate

Low

Low

Low

Moderate

Moderate

Low

Moderate

7

Elton-Marshall et al., 2015

Moderate

Low

Low

Low

Moderate

Low

Low

Moderate

9

Fathelrahman et al., 2013

Moderate

Low

Low

Low

Moderate

Low

Low

Moderate

11

Gravely et al., 2016a

Moderate

Low

Low

Low

Moderate

Moderate

Low

Moderate

12

Gravely et al., 2016b

Moderate

Low

Low

Low

Low

Moderate

Low

Moderate

13

Green et al., 2014

Moderate

Low

Low

Low

Low

Moderate

Low

Moderate

14

Green et al., 2019

Moderate

Low

Moderate

Low

Low

Moderate

Low

Moderate

16

Hitchman et al., 2014

Moderate

Low

Low

Low

Low

Moderate

Low

Moderate

17

Kasza et al., 2017

Moderate

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Moderate

18

Kennedy et al., 2012

Moderate

Low

Low

Low

Low

Moderate

Low

Moderate

19

Li et al., 2015

Moderate

Moderate

Low

Low

NI

Moderate

Low

Moderate

20

Lin et al., 2016

Moderate

Moderate

Low

Low

Low

Moderate

Low

Moderate

21

Mannocci et al., 2019

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Low

NI

Moderate

Low

Moderate

22

Mays et al., 2014

Moderate

Low

Low

Low

Low

Moderate

Low

Moderate

24

Nagelhout et al., 2016

Moderate

Moderate

Low

Low

Low

Moderate

Low

Moderate

25

Ngan et al., 2016

Moderate

Low

Moderate

Low

Low

Moderate

Low

Moderate

26

Nicholson et al., 2017

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Low

Low

Moderate

Low

Moderate

27

Osman et al., 2016

Moderate

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Moderate

29

Partos et al., 2013

Moderate

Serious

Low

Low

Low

Moderate

Low

Serious

32

Swayampakala et al., 2014

Moderate

Low

Low

Low

Low

Moderate

Low

Moderate

33

White et al., 2008

Moderate

Low

Low

Low

Moderate

Moderate

Low

Moderate

34

Yong et al., 2013

Moderate

Low

Low

Low

Moderate

Moderate

Low

Moderate

35

Yong et al., 2016

Moderate

Low

Moderate

Low

Low

Moderate

Low

Moderate

  1. RoB2