Table 2 Comparison of ratings of interventions between framed and non-framed participants / participants with and without children
Intervention | Difference Framing - no Framing | Difference participants with – and without children | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Test statistics W1 | p-value1 and direction of effect2 | Test statistics W1 | p-value1 and direction of effect2 | |
Theoretical concept | 106,294.5 | p < 0.0001 (NF) | 112,077.5 | p = 0.0061 (C) |
Traffic light labelling system | 119,238.0 | p = 0.1786 (NF) | 119,146.0 | p = 0.2702 (C) |
Traffic light labelling system (children) | 137,450.0 | p = 0.0053 (F) | 120,777.0 | p = 0.4900 (C) |
Warning labels | 124,520.0 | p = 0.9108 (NF) | 120,511.5 | p = 0.4334 (C) |
Warning labels (children) | 126,136.0 | p = 0.7990 (F) | 125,639.0 | p = 0.6867 (NC) |
Supermarket checkouts | 129,481.0 | p = 0.3095 (F) | 111,942.0 | p = 0.0067 (C) |
Supermarket checkouts (children) | 129,869.5 | p = 0.2750 (F) | 111,586.5 | p = 0.0058 (C) |
Supermarket general | 129,305.0 | p = 0.3193 (F) | 114,684.5 | p = 0.0332 (C) |
Supermarket general (children) | 135,597.5 | p = 0.0174 (F) | 116,119.0 | p = 0.0815 (C) |
Canteens | 125,357.5 | p = 0.9345 (F) | 118,090.0 | p = 0.1830 (C) |
Canteens (children) | 132,674.5 | p = 0.0851 (F) | 116,786.5 | p = 0.1115 (C) |
Advertisement | 129,521.0 | p = 0.3021 (F) | 116,213.0 | p = 0.0799 (C) |
Advertisement (children) | 130,463.5 | p = 0.2196 (F) | 126,463.5 | p = 0.5550 (NC) |
Environment | 126,346.0 | p = 0.7528 (F) | 119,343.5 | p = 0.2895 (C) |
Environment (children) | 123,637.5 | p = 0.7531 (NF) | 115,604.0 | p = 0.0557 (C) |