Table 2 Factors associated with possible COVID-19: adjusted OR (95% CI) Multinomial regression results Reference group: probable infection prior to the lockdown. OR adjusted for all the variables presented in the table
no symptoms/likely infection prior the lockdown | P-Value | likely infection during the lockdown/likely infection prior the lockdown | P-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Age | ||||
18–34 | 1 | 1 | ||
35–44 | 0.95 (0.77–1.17) | 0.622 | 1.00 (0.72–1.38) | 0.99 |
45–54 | 0.87 (0.71–1.07) | 0.198 | 0.69 (0.49–0.97) | 0.035 |
55–64 | 1.09 (0.86–1.37) | 0.475 | 0.73 (0.49–1.07) | 0.101 |
Sex | ||||
Female | 1 | 1 | ||
Male | 1.00 (0.86–1.15) | 0.95 | 1.03 (0.82–1.30) | 0.809 |
Social Class | ||||
Upper class | 1 | 1 | ||
Upper middle class | 0.98 (0.82–1.18) | 0.861 | 1.09 (0.80–1.48) | 0.594 |
Lower middle class | 1.15 (0.87–1.50) | 0.322 | 1.28 (0.84–1.97) | 0.251 |
Working class | 1.11 (0.83–1.49) | 0.467 | 1.57 (1.00–2.48) | 0.051 |
Health professional | 1.05 (0.69–1.61) | 0.82 | 1.66 (0.91–3.04) | 0.098 |
Professional status | ||||
Unemployed at the time of lockdown’s onset | 1 | 1 | ||
Employed and stopped working since COVID | 1.03 (0.85–1.25) | 0.77 | 0.79 (0.56–1.12) | 0.181 |
Full time teleworking | 0.84 (0.67–1.05) | 0.126 | 1.11 (0.78–1.58) | 0.568 |
in-person professional activities | 1.25 (0.96–1.62) | 0.104 | 1.53 (1.03–2.29) | 0.037 |
Overcrowding housing | 0.80 (0.60–1.06) | 0.121 | 1.24 (0.80–1.90) | 0.338 |
Region | ||||
Ile-de-France | 1 | 1 | ||
Grand Est | 0.99 (0.83–1.18) | 0.924 | 0.84 (0.63–1.13) | 0.258 |
Hauts-de-France | 1.39 (1.13–1.71) | 0.002 | 1.26 (0.91–1.74) | 0.168 |