Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of included secondary analyses

From: Characterization of immunization secondary analyses using demographic and health surveys (DHS) and multiple indicator cluster surveys (MICS), 2006–2018

Variables

Group

Total (N = 116)

N

%

Publication metric

 Publish time period

2006–2011

26

22.4

2012- August 2018

90

77.6

 Country of affiliationsa

High income

80

68.9

Low-middle income

36

31.0

 Country analyzed

Multiple countries

37

31.9

Single country

79

68.1

 Affiliations match with survey countriesb

Yes

38

48.1

No

41

51.9

 Survey year (last year)

before 2011

84

72.4

2012–2018

32

27.6

 Publication delay

Mean (SD)

5.4 (2.6)

Within 5 years

66

56.9

More than 5 years

50

43.1

Analyses content

 Survey types

DHS

100

86.2

MICS

7

6.0

Both

9

7.8

 Outcomes

Specific immunization

55

41.7

Complete/full immunization

53

40.2

Partial or incomplete immunization

12

9.4

Never vaccinated

11

8.3

Otherc

1

0.8

 Type of analysis

Factors associated

77

55.4

Inequalities

21

15.1

Timeliness

12

8.6

Trends

16

11.5

Others

13

9.4

Proxies for “quality”

 How persons without documented vaccination were handled

Caregiver recall used

86

74.1

Recall excluded

12

10.3

Not mentioned

17

14.6

From other sourcesd

1

0.9

 Percentage of documented vaccination seen

Mentioned

36

31.0

No mentioned

80

69.0

 Weighted analysis

Yes

67

57.8

No

4

3.4

Not mentioned

45

38.8

 Potential survey biases

Listed

54

46.6

Not listed

62

53.4

 Limitation(s) of secondary analyses

Listed

89

76.7

Not listed

27

23.3

  1. aThe affiliations of first and corresponding authors separately counted; most of them (110/116) were from the same affiliation or income-level country. For those with first and corresponding author had a different affiliation (6/116), the higher income-level was used for classification
  2. bOnly secondary analyses using survey data from single country are included here (i.e., multi-country analyses exclude from this row)
  3. cThe one outcome listed as “other” was on knowledge about Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) vaccine
  4. dInformation from administrative activities (e.g., vaccination records kept by health facilities), censuses, and vital registration systems was referred