Skip to main content

Table 2 Child participants’ characteristics

From: Are park availability and satisfaction with neighbourhood parks associated with physical activity and time spent outdoors?

 

N = 753

Child’s sex, n (%)

 Male

387 (51.4)

 Female

366 (48.6)

Child’s age (years) – mean [SD]

8.8 [3.7]

Residential location, n (%)

 Lives within 5 km of intervention park

332 (44.1)

 Lives within 5 km of control park

421 (55.9)

Adult education level, n (%)

 No formal qualifications

47 (6.2)

 Year12/apprentice/diploma

219 (29.1)

 University/higher

487 (64.7)

Adult employment status, n (%)

 Full-time work

246 (32.7)

 Part-time work or study

284 (37.7)

 Not working

223 (29.6)

Marital status, n (%)

 Married/de facto

664 (88.4)

 Separated/widowed/divorced

66 (8.8)

 Never married

21 (2.8)

Country of birth, n (%)

 Australia

539 (71.7)

 Other

213 (28.3)

Dog ownership, n (%)

277 (36.8)

Other child in household, n (%)

597 (79.3)

Child visits park without adult (i.e. alone or with friends/siblings), n (%)

271 (36.0)

Satisfaction with parks for child, n (%)

 Strongly disagree

24 (3.2)

 Disagree

69 (9.2)

 Neither agree nor disagree

90 (12.0)

 Agree

391 (51.9)

 Strongly agree

179 (23.8)

Child visited park in past 7 days, n (%)

496 (65.9)

Parks within walking distance for child, n (%)

712 (94.6)

Time child spent outside (minutes/week) - mean [SD], median [IQR]

652.8 [462.9],

 

540.0 [300.0–900.0]

Days child met physical activity recommendations (5-15 yrs., n = 591) – mean [SD], median [IQR]

4.2 [2.0], 4.0 [3.0–6.0]