Table 2 Protocol for Assigning Intensity Score for Each Strategy, Missouri HSHC 2013–2017
Dimension | Rubric for Scoring Intensity (0.1 = low;1.0 = high) | Related Examples |
|---|---|---|
Purpose | High (1.0): Modifying policies, systems, and access Med (0.55): Enhancing services and support Low (0.1): Providing information; enhancing skills | High: A long-term transportation plan was passed and included a sales tax to generate revenue to support pedestrian and transportation infrastructure Med: PA opportunities were offered as a reward in place of food but was not a mandated policy Low: Fun fit night for families to engage in activities together |
Duration | High (1.0): Ongoing, throughout the year Med (0.55): More than once per year Low (0.1): One-time event | High: Joint-use agreement in place to enable school grounds to be used for PA after school hours Med: Walking challenge occurring twice throughout the year Low: 5 k Run |
Reacha | High (1.0): 21% or more of the population Medium (0.55): 6–20% of the population Low (0.1): 0–5% of the population | High: Livable Streets policy Medium: Revised wellness policy impacted schools districtwide Low: A rock wall was installed at a middle school |