Skip to main content

Table 2 Association between mothers’ work schedule and adolescents’ obesity, overall and stratified by income level

From: Mothers’ nonstandard work schedules and adolescent obesity: a population-based cross-sectional study in the Tokyo metropolitan area

 

Crude model

Adjusted model 1a

Adjusted model 2b

Adjusted model 3c

Mothers’ work schedule

OR

95% CI

OR

95% CI

OR

95% CI

OR

95% CI

Overall (N = 1743)

 Standard

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

 Nonstandard

1.56

1.02–2.40

1.47

0.94–2.28

1.49

0.95–2.34

1.44

0.92–2.27

 Not employed

1.20

0.71–2.04

1.21

0.70–2.09

1.22

0.71–2.11

1.18

0.68–2.04

Stratified by income level

 Low–middle income (N = 621)

  Standard

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

  Nonstandard

0.93

0.49–1.74

0.97

0.50–1.86

0.97

0.50–1.90

0.88

0.40–1.74

  Not employed

1.06

0.46–2.40

1.02

0.44–2.38

1.06

0.45–2.49

0.95

0.40–2.27

 High income (N = 825)

  Standard

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

  Nonstandard

2.80

1.43–5.50

2.83

1.41–5.69

2.93

1.45–5.92

2.90

1.43–5.86

  Not employed

1.59

0.69–3.66

1.90

0.81–4.50

1.89

0.80–4.48

1.83

0.77–4.37

  1. aAdjusted for adolescent’s sex, adolescent’s type of high school, adolescent’s part-time job, mother’s age, mother’s psychological distress, household income, living with grandparents, and living with siblings
  2. bAdjusted model 1 + father’s work schedule
  3. cAdjusted model 2 + adolescent’s lifestyle habits