Skip to main content

Table 4 Regression analysis results of MET-minutes with trip-based greenspace for overall and activity-specific findings

From: Neighbourhood and path-based greenspace in three European countries: associations with objective physical activity

Model Greenspace metric Change in MET-minutes (95% CI) per 10 percentage point increase in mean trip-greenspace (50 m buffer)
MET-minutes
Overall Walkinga Cyclinga
Model 1: unadjusted NDVI 7.34 (2.25 to 12.44) 4.24 (2.57 to 5.91) 13.65 (6.23 to 21.07)
TCD 9.16 (2.63 to 15.69) 6.34 (3.78 to 8.91) 23.91 (2.85 to 44.97)
GLU 3.15 (0.12 to 6.17) 2.96 (0.60 to 5.32) 7.29 (− 2.94 to 17.53)
Model 2: model 1 + adjustment for age + sex + season + bluespace NDVI 7.20 (2.39 to 12.01) 4.30 (2.83 to 5.77) 13.73 (5.83 to 21.67)
TCD 8.56 (3.04 to 14.09) 5.89 (3.91 to 7.87) 23.32 (2.54 to 44.09)
GLU 3.18 (− 0.01 to 6.37) 2.90 (0.40 to 5.39) 7.89 (− 2.70 to 18.48)
Model 3: model 2 + adjustment for walk score + residential greenspace + car + dog + education + employment + weekday + weather NDVI 10.41 (4.43 to 16.39) 7.81 (4.12 to 11.50) 15.53 (8.60 to 22.45)
TCD 10.63 (4.96 to 16.30) 8.10 (4.93 to 11.28) 22.79 (5.24 to 40.34)
GLU 3.36 (0.00 to 6.72) 3.29 (0.27 to 6.30) 6.00 (− 3.34 to 15.34)
  1. n = 3 study centres; n = 60 individuals; n = 1014 trips
  2. aAdjusted for interaction between greenspace and activity