Skip to main content

Table 4 Regression analysis results of MET-minutes with trip-based greenspace for overall and activity-specific findings

From: Neighbourhood and path-based greenspace in three European countries: associations with objective physical activity

Model

Greenspace metric

Change in MET-minutes (95% CI) per 10 percentage point increase in mean trip-greenspace (50 m buffer)

MET-minutes

Overall

Walkinga

Cyclinga

Model 1: unadjusted

NDVI

7.34 (2.25 to 12.44)

4.24 (2.57 to 5.91)

13.65 (6.23 to 21.07)

TCD

9.16 (2.63 to 15.69)

6.34 (3.78 to 8.91)

23.91 (2.85 to 44.97)

GLU

3.15 (0.12 to 6.17)

2.96 (0.60 to 5.32)

7.29 (− 2.94 to 17.53)

Model 2: model 1 + adjustment for age + sex + season + bluespace

NDVI

7.20 (2.39 to 12.01)

4.30 (2.83 to 5.77)

13.73 (5.83 to 21.67)

TCD

8.56 (3.04 to 14.09)

5.89 (3.91 to 7.87)

23.32 (2.54 to 44.09)

GLU

3.18 (− 0.01 to 6.37)

2.90 (0.40 to 5.39)

7.89 (− 2.70 to 18.48)

Model 3: model 2 + adjustment for walk score + residential greenspace + car + dog + education + employment + weekday + weather

NDVI

10.41 (4.43 to 16.39)

7.81 (4.12 to 11.50)

15.53 (8.60 to 22.45)

TCD

10.63 (4.96 to 16.30)

8.10 (4.93 to 11.28)

22.79 (5.24 to 40.34)

GLU

3.36 (0.00 to 6.72)

3.29 (0.27 to 6.30)

6.00 (− 3.34 to 15.34)

  1. n = 3 study centres; n = 60 individuals; n = 1014 trips
  2. aAdjusted for interaction between greenspace and activity