Skip to main content

Table 9 Factors associated with PC-NTDs surveillance data analysis

From: Assessment of surveillance core and support functions regarding neglected tropical diseases in Kenya

   PC-NTDs surveillance data analysis Unadjusted Estimates Adjusted Estimates
Characteristic N No, n (%) Yes, n (%) OR (95% CI) p-value OR (95% CI) p-value
Availability of PC-NTDs case definitions
 No 180 41 (61%) 26 (39%) 1.00   1.00  
 Yes   32 (28%) 81 (72%) 4.76 (2.69, 8.43) < 0.001 2.76 (1.44, 5.31) 0.002
Availability of PC-NTDs case registers
 No 189 72 (47%) 81 (53%) 1.00   1.00  
 Yes   6 (17%) 30 (83%) 4.50 (1.75, 11.60) 0.002 2.28 (1.08, 4.83) 0.030
Feedback on PC-NTDs surveillance reports
 No 172 52 (51%) 50 (49%) 1.00   1.00  
 Yes   12 (17%) 58 (83%) 5.03 (2.52, 10.0) < 0.001 5.11 (2.13, 12.3) < 0.001
Supervision of surveillance activities
 No 189 8 (24%) 26 (76%) 1.00   1.00  
 Yes   70 (45%) 85 (55%) 0.37 (0.15, 0.90) 0.029 0.30 (0.11, 0.81) 0.017
Availability of computers
 No 188 57 (51%) 55 (49%) 1.00   1.00  
 Yes   21 (28%) 55 (72%) 2.81 (1.40, 5.67) 0.004 2.47 (1.18, 5.18) 0.017
Availability of surveillance posters
 No 188 44 (61%) 28 (39%) 1.00   1.00  
 Yes   34 (29%) 82 (71%) 3.92 (1.78, 8.66) 0.001 3.37 (1.52, 7.48) 0.003
  1. N Number of observations with valid data analysed, OR Odds Ratio, 95% CI 95% Confidence Interval