Skip to main content

Table 9 Factors associated with PC-NTDs surveillance data analysis

From: Assessment of surveillance core and support functions regarding neglected tropical diseases in Kenya

  

PC-NTDs surveillance data analysis

Unadjusted Estimates

Adjusted Estimates

Characteristic

N

No, n (%)

Yes, n (%)

OR (95% CI)

p-value

OR (95% CI)

p-value

Availability of PC-NTDs case definitions

 No

180

41 (61%)

26 (39%)

1.00

 

1.00

 

 Yes

 

32 (28%)

81 (72%)

4.76 (2.69, 8.43)

< 0.001

2.76 (1.44, 5.31)

0.002

Availability of PC-NTDs case registers

 No

189

72 (47%)

81 (53%)

1.00

 

1.00

 

 Yes

 

6 (17%)

30 (83%)

4.50 (1.75, 11.60)

0.002

2.28 (1.08, 4.83)

0.030

Feedback on PC-NTDs surveillance reports

 No

172

52 (51%)

50 (49%)

1.00

 

1.00

 

 Yes

 

12 (17%)

58 (83%)

5.03 (2.52, 10.0)

< 0.001

5.11 (2.13, 12.3)

< 0.001

Supervision of surveillance activities

 No

189

8 (24%)

26 (76%)

1.00

 

1.00

 

 Yes

 

70 (45%)

85 (55%)

0.37 (0.15, 0.90)

0.029

0.30 (0.11, 0.81)

0.017

Availability of computers

 No

188

57 (51%)

55 (49%)

1.00

 

1.00

 

 Yes

 

21 (28%)

55 (72%)

2.81 (1.40, 5.67)

0.004

2.47 (1.18, 5.18)

0.017

Availability of surveillance posters

 No

188

44 (61%)

28 (39%)

1.00

 

1.00

 

 Yes

 

34 (29%)

82 (71%)

3.92 (1.78, 8.66)

0.001

3.37 (1.52, 7.48)

0.003

  1. N Number of observations with valid data analysed, OR Odds Ratio, 95% CI 95% Confidence Interval