Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices, frequency of applied suspect case definitions and availability of materials

From: Knowledge, attitudes and practices towards viral haemorrhagic fevers amongst healthcare workers in urban and rural public healthcare facilities in the N’zérékoré prefecture, Guinea: a cross-sectional study

 

Whole Prefecture

Urban N = 60

Rural N = 42

p value

Number of Participants – n/N (%)

102

60/102 (58.8)

42/102 (41.2)

Knowledge

 Mean knowledge score max. 5 (SD)

4.3 (0.7)

4.3 (0.7)

4.2 (0.8)

0.52

 Overall good knowledge (≥3) - n/N (%)

101/102 (99.0)

60/60 (100.0)

41/42 (97.6)

0.41

 Knew correct incubation period - n/N (%)

89/102 (87.3)

54/60 (90.0)

35/42 (83.3)

0.37

 Knew the beginning of infectiousness - n/N (%)

63/102 (61.8)

36/60 (60.0)

27/42 (64.3)

0.69

 Knew sufficient modes of transmission - n/N (%)

98/102 (96.1)

58/60 (96.7)

40/42 (95.2)

1.00

 Knew sufficient initial symptoms - n/N (%)

96/102 (94.1)

56/60 (93.3)

40/42 (95.2)

1.00

 Knew correct way to dispose corpse - n/N (%)

90/102 (88.2)

54/102 (90.0)

36/42 (85.7)

0.55

 Identified EVD as VHF- n/N (%)

102/102 (100.0)

60/60 (100.0)

42/42 (100.0)

 Identified LF as VHF- n/N (%)

87/102 (85.3)

49/60 (81.7)

38/42 (90.4)

0.27

 Identified CCHF as VHF- n/N (%)

74/102 (72.5)

41/60 (68.3)

33/42 (78.8)

0.27

 Identified MVD as VHF- n/N (%)

36/102 (35.3)

23/60 (38.3)

13/42 (31.0)

0.53

 Identified RVF as VHF- n/N (%)

33/102 (32.4)

14/60 (23.3)

19/42 (45.2)

0.031

VHF suspect case definition in clinical practice

 Fever and unspecific haemorrhage - n/N (%)

57/102 (55.9)

38/60 (63.3)

19/42 (45.2)

 

 Fever and specific haemorrhage - n/N (%)

22/102 (21.6)

12/60 (20.0)

10/42 (23.8)

 

 Fever and general symptoms - n/N (%)

10/102 (9.8)

7/60 (11.7)

3/42 (7.1)

 

 Other - n/N (%)

8/102 (7.8)

2/60 (3.3)

6/42 (14.3)

 

 No idea - n/N (%)

5/102 (4.9)

1/60 (1.7)

4/42 (9.5)

 

Attitudes

 Would receive survivor as patient - n/N (%)

99/102 (97.1)

57/60 (95.0)

42/42 (100.0)

0.51

 Would welcome survivor in community - n/N (%)

99/102 (97.1)

59/60 (98.3)

40/42 (95.2)

0.71

 Believed HCW survivor still posed risk to facility - n/N (%)

21/102 (20.6)

8/60 (13.3)

13/42 (31.0)

0.006

 Would accept approved vaccine for oneself - n/N (%)

101/102 (99.0)

59/60 (98.3)

42/42 (100.0)

1.00

 Would accept approved vaccine for child - n/N (%)

99/102 (97.1)

59/60 (98.3)

40/42 (95.2)

0.17

 Would accept experimental treatment for oneself - n/N (%)

41/102 (40.2)

16/60 (26.7)

25/42 (59.5)

< 0.001

 Would accept experimental treatment for parent - n/N (%)

38/102 (37.3)

14/60 (23.3)

22/42 (52.4)

0.001

Practices

 Overall good practices - n/N (%)

61/101 (60.4)

33/60 (55.0)

28/41 (66.7)

0.22

 Good general precautions - n/N (%)

91/101 (90.1)

50/60 (83.3)

41/41 (100.0)

0.005

 Mean general precautions score max. 5 (SD)

4.6 (0.4)

4.4 (0.4)

4.8 (0.2)

< 0.001

 Good suspect case identification - n/N (%)

69/97 (71.1)

43/59 (72.9)

26/38 (68.4)

0.65

 Mean suspect case identification score max.5 (SD)

4.3 (0.6)

4.3 (0.6)

4.3 (0.6)

0.68

 Good suspect case management - n/N (%)

78/90 (86.7)

49/58 (84.5)

29/32 (90.6)

0.53

 Mean suspect case management score max. 5 (SD)

4.6 (0.6)

4.6 (0.6)

4.6 (0.5)

0.87

Availability of materials

 Gloves unavailable - n/N (%)

8/102 (7.8)

7/60 (11.7)

1/42 (2.4)

0.14

 Masks unavailable - n/N (%)

11/102 (10.8)

10/60 (16.7)

1/42 (2.4)

0.025

 Goggles unavailable - n/N (%)

17/102 (16.7)

11/60 (18.3)

6/42 (14.3)

0.79

 Infrared thermometer unavailable - n/N (%)

4/102 (3.9)

4/60 (6.7)

0/42 (0.0)

0.14

 PPE unavailable - n/N (%)

12/102 (11.8)

12/60 (20.0)

0/42 (0.0)

0.003