Skip to main content

Table 3 Associations between school ethos and gambling. Odds ratios from two-level binary logistic regressions. n = 5123 students distributed across 46 upper secondary schools

From: School ethos and adolescent gambling: a multilevel study of upper secondary schools in Stockholm, Sweden

 

Empty model

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

Model 4

 

OR

95% CI

OR

95% CI

OR

95% CI

OR

95% CI

Student level

 Gender

  Boy (ref.)

 

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

  Girl

 

0.23***

0.19–0.27

0.22***

0.19–0.27

0.23***

0.19–0.28

0.23***

0.19–0.28

Family structure

 Two parents in the same household (ref.)

 

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

 Other

 

1.15

0.97–1.37

1.15

0.96–1.37

1.15

0.96–1.37

1.14

0.96–1.35

Parental university education

 No parent (ref.)

 

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

 At least one parent

 

0.86

0.71–1.03

0.87

0.72–1.04

0.86

0.72–1.04

0.89

0.74–1.07

Parental unemployment

 No parent (ref.)

 

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

 At least one parent

 

0.97

0.68–1.37

0.97

0.68–1.37

0.97

0.68–1.38

0.98

0.69–1.39

Migration background

  ≥ 10 years in Sweden (ref.)

 

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

  < 10 years in Sweden

 

0.79

0.57–1.07

0.81

0.59–1.10

0.81

0.60–1.11

0.80

0.58–1.09

School level

 % students with parents with post-secondary education

   

0.99*

0.99–1.00

0.99**

0.98–1.00

0.99**

0.99–1.00

 % students with a foreign background

     

1.00

0.99–1.01

0.99

0.99–1.00

School ethos

 Weak (ref.)

       

1.00

 Intermediate

       

1.02

0.74–1.40

 Strong

       

0.62**

0.43–0.89

 ICC

7.9%

4.8%

 

3.9%

 

3.7%

 

2.6%

 
  1. ***p < 0.001 **p < 0.01 *p < 0.05