Skip to main content

Table 4 Association between intervention and well-being

From: Disabled People’s Organisations increase access to services and improve well-being: evidence from a cluster randomized trial in North India

WELL-BEINGnModel 1aModel 2b
Intervention Odds Ratio (95% CI)p-valueIntervention Odds Ratio (95% CI)p-value
Confident3701.12 (0.5 to 2.6)0.781.64 (0.9 to 2.98)0.15
Respected by community4021.36 (0.58 to 3.22)0.481.34 (0.6 to 3.0)0.47
Opinion3991.62 (0.85 to 3.1)0.141.94 (1.16 to 3.24)0.01
Able to make friends3411.3 (0.45 to 3.79)0.631.63 (1 to 2.65)0.05
Living condition4332.28 (0.96 to 5.41)0.062.01 (0.89 to 4.62)0.09
Help Others3800.83 (0.24 to 2.86)0.761.28 (0.7 to 2.33)0.42
  1. aExplanatory factors: group and baseline; adjusted for clusters (ADPs)
  2. bExplanatory factors: group, baseline and NGO; adjusted for clusters (ADPs) Chamba (NGO) was the reference group in the GEE model 2 with implementing NGO added as a covariate