Table 2 Compliance in Minneapolis vs. St. Paul
From: Store and neighborhood differences in retailer compliance with a local staple foods ordinance
Compliance Outcome | City | Pre-policy (2014) Mean (SE) | Implementation only (2015) Mean (SE) | Early initiation of enforcement (2016) Mean (SE) | Continued monitoring (2017) Mean (SE) | Overall Effect (time-by-city) P (dfā=ā3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Met 80% of ordinance standards (% of stores) | Minneapolis (Policy) | 24.4 (4.9) | 40.7 (5.6) | 31.0 (5.2) | 50.5 (5.9) | 0.83 |
St. Paul (Control) | 3.2 (2.2) | 11.6 (4.1) | 6.7 (3.2) | 14.4 (4.7) | Ā | |
10 point scale (0ā10; 1 point for each standard met) | Minneapolis (Policy) | 5.7 (0.3) | 6.4 (0.3) | 6.6 (0.2) | 7.1 (0.2) | 0.30 |
St. Paul (Control) | 4.4 (0.2) | 4.7 (0.3) | 4.9 (0.3) | 5.3 (0.3) | Ā | |
Have any food in each of 10 categories (% of stores) | Minneapolis (Policy) | 27.6 (5.2) | 39.0 (5.5) | 51.1 (5.8) | 75.1 (5.1) | 0.01 |
St. Paul (Control) | 12.3 (4.1) | 12.7 (4.2) | 16.3 (4.7) | 19.1 (5.2) | Ā | |
p-net | Ā | pā=ā0.27 | pā=ā0.13 | pā=ā0.0009 | Ā |