Skip to main content

Table 2 Prevalence and correlates of central obesity by different selected characteristics of the respondents (N = 392)

From: Setting – based prevalence and correlates of central obesity: findings from a cross-sectional study among formal sector employees in Dodoma City, Central Tanzania

Variable

Central Obesity (%)#

OR (95% CI)

p-value

AOR (95% CI

p-value

Sex

  

< 0.001

 

< 0.001

 Male

71 (28.0)***

1

 

1

 Female

93 (67.4)

5.33 (3.39,8.35)

 

9.53 (5.49, 16.78)

Age

  

< 0.001

 

0.018

 ≤ 30

26 (25.5)***

1

 

1

 31–40

466 (43.4)

2.24 (1.29, 3.88)

 

2.05 (1.06, 3.96)

 41–50

45 (48.4)

2.74 (1.49, 5.00)

 

2.58 (1.19, 5.57)

 ≥ 51

51 (60.0)

4.39 (2.08, 9.23)

 

4.15 (1.65, 10.42)

Employment sector

  

0.205

 Public

113 (44.1)*

1

 

 Private

51 (37.5)

0.76 (0.49, 1.16)

 

Educational status

  

0.14

 Non bachelor degree

49 (33.8)**

1

 

 Bachelor Degree and higher

115 (46.6)

1.71 (1.12, 2.61)

 

Type of occupation

  

0.006

 Supportive staff

45 (32.4)**

1

 

 Professional staff

81 (44.0)

1.64 (1.04, 2.60)

 

 Administrative staff

38 (55.1)

2.56 (1.42, 4.63)

 

Monthly salary (TSh)

  

0.02

 <  400,000

32 (31.1)**

1

 

 400,000–1,000,000

70 (40.0)

1.48 (0.88,2.48)

 

 >  1,000,000

62 (54.4)

2.65 (1.52, 4.62)

 

Means of transport to and from workplace

  

0.18

 Walking/ bicycle

12 (25.5)**

1

 

 Motor vehicle/ cycle

152 (44.1)

2.29 (1.15, 4.58)

 

Source of meals at workplace

  

0.002

0.041

 Food vendors

137 (39.1)**

1

 

1

 Homemade

27 (64.3)

2.79 (1.44, 5.45)

 

2.32 (1.04, 4.19)

Current alcohol use

  

0.151

 No

94 (39.0)*

1

 

 Yes

70 (46.4)

1.35 (0.89, 2.04)

 

Hypertension

  

0.006

0.005

 No

139 (39.5)**

1

 

1

 Yes

25 (62.5)

2.55 (1.30, 5.02)

 

3.12 (1.41, 6.91)

  1. #Differences in prevalence was assessed by chi-square test and the p-value obtained were as follows; *** p = < 0.001, ** p = < 0.05,* p = ≥ 0.05