Table 3 The results of hierarchical logistic regression analyses predicting the likelihood of reporting ‘good’ self-rated health

 Bonding social capital

1.17^* (1.08–1.26)

1.14^* (1.04–1.24)

1.11^* (1.02–1.22)

1.09 (0.99–1.19)

 Bridging social capital

1.04 (0.98–1.12)

1.09^* (1.01–1.18)

1.09^* (1.01–1.18)

1.08 (0.99–1.17)

 Age (ref: < 60 years)

1.96^* (1.28–3.04)

2.04^* (1.32–3.18)

1.95^* (1.26–3.04)

 Gender (ref: male)

1.90^* (1.18–3.06)

1.99^* (1.22–3.23)

2.06^* (1.26–3.36)

 Race/ethnicity (ref: white)

1.09 (0.63–1.93)

1.03 (0.59–1.85)

1.02 (0.58–1.80)

 Marital status (ref: single or no partnership)

1.22 (0.81–1.84)

1.23 (0.81–1.86)

1.04 (0.67–1.62)

 Yes, one

0.37^* (0.22–0.60)

0.37^* (0.22–0.61)

0.38^* (0.23–0.64)

 Yes, one or more

0.10^* (0.06–0.16)

0.10^* (0.06–0.17)

0.10^* (0.06–0.18)

 P-for-liner trends

<.001

<.001

<.001

 < 600 MET-mins/wk

0.98 (0.59–1.63)

0.94 (0.57–1.57)

 ≥ 600 MET-mins/wk

1.97^* (1.21–3.21)

1.83^* (1.11–3.00)

 P-for-liner trend

.007

.017

 Middle

1.29 (0.79–2.12)

 High

2.14^* (1.13–4.05)

 P-for-liner trend

.020

 Middle

0.98 (0.58–1.67)

 High

1.33 (0.72–2.45)

 P-for-liner trend

.361

Nagelkerke R²

.076

.256

.274

.292

Goodness of Fit (P-value) ^a

.230

.290

.100

.414