From: Design and validation of brucellosis prevention questionnaire focused on animal vaccination
Characteristics | Total (n = 432) | Exploratory Factor analysis data (n = 212) | Confirmatory Factor analysis data(n = 220) | P-valuea |
---|---|---|---|---|
Number (%) | Number (%) | Number (%) | ||
Age: Mean ± SD) | 51.68 ± 16.40 | 51.43 ± 16.78 | 51.92 ± 16.05 | 0.76 |
Sex | ||||
 Male | 432(100%) | 212(100%) | 220(100%) |  |
 Femaleb | 0(0%) | 0(0%) | 0(0%) |  |
Animal type | Â | Â | Â | 0.77 |
 Cow | 53 (12.3%) | 25 (11.8%) | 28 (12.7%) |  |
 Sheep & Goat | 379 (87.7%) | 187 (88.2%) | 192 (87.3%) |  |
Job | Â | Â | Â | 0.91 |
 self-employed | 16 (3.7%) | 6 (2.8%) | 10 (4.5%) |  |
 employee | 12 (2.8%) | 6 (2.8) | 6 (2.7%) |  |
 Farmer | 329 (76.1%) | 162 (76.4%) | 167 (75.9%) |  |
 Unemployed | 75 (17.4%) | 38 (18.0%) | 37 (16.9%) |  |
Educational level | Â | Â | Â | 0.95 |
 Illiterate | 191 (44.2%) | 92 (43.4%) | 99 (45.0%) |  |
 Elementary | 14 (42.6%) | 93 (43.9%) | 91 (41.4%) |  |
 High school | 48 (11.1%) | 23 (10.8%) | 25 (11.4%) |  |
 Graduate diploma | 9 (2.1%) | 4 (1.9%) | 5 (2.3%) |  |
Income | Â | Â | Â | 0.64 |
 Less than household expenses | 382 (88.4%) | 189 (89.2%) | 193 (87.7%) |  |
 Equal to household expenses | 50 (11.6%) | 23 (10.8%) | 27 (12.3%) |  |
Prior brucellosis prevention | ||||
 No | 412 (95.4%) | 202 (95.3%) | 210 (95.5%) | 0.93 |
 Yes | 20 (4.6%) | 10 (4.7%) | 10 (4.5%) |  |
Previous history of brucellosis in humans | Â | Â | Â | 0.79 |
 No | 256 (59.3%) | 127 (59.9%) | 129 (58.6%) |  |
 Yes | 176 (40.7%) | 85 (40.1%) | 91 (41.4%) |  |
The number of family members (Range) | 7 (2–12) | 6 (3–11) | 7 (2–12) | 0.96 |