Table 4 Effects of migration on access to family planning services among women by volume of migration
From: Migration and family planning in the state with highest total fertility rate in India
Characteristics | Low male out-migration area (LMA) | High male out-migration area (HMA) | HMA vs LMA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
%(N) | AOR (95% CI), p-value€ | %(N) | AOR (95% CI), p-value€ | AOR (95% CI), p-value€ | |
Overall | 22·4 (446) | 20·3 (491) | 0·65 (0·40–1·04), p = 0·073 | ||
Migration status of husband | |||||
Resident | 19·2 (266) | Referent | 23·0 (280) | Referent | 0·95 (0·53–1·70), p = 0·860 |
Migrant | 27·1 (180) | 1·29 (0·77–2·16), p = 0·333 | 17·0 (211) | 0·46 (0·29–0·72), p = 0·001 | 0·31 (0·14–0·71), p = 0·005 |
Frequency of husband’s home visita | |||||
Infrequent (Once or less in a year) | 27·1 (62) | Referent | 13·2 (84) | Referent | 0·10 (0·01–0·78), p = 0·028 |
Frequent (Multiple visits within a year) | 27·0 (118) | 0·67 (0·28–1·61), p = 0·369 | 19·4 (127) | 1·58 (0·63–3·94), p = 0·331 | 0·32 (0·11–0·92), p = 0·034 |
Number of days husband stays during home visitsa | |||||
< 30 days | 31·6 (105) | 1·31 (0·58–2·97), p = 0·512 | 22·2 (97) | 3·76 (1·45–9·76), p = 0·006 | 0·24 (0·06–1·02), p = 0·054 |
30+ days | 20·8 (75) | Referent | 12·6 (114) | Referent | 0·12 (0·02–0·74), p = 0·023 |
Destination where husband is currently workinga | |||||
Short distance destination | 17·9 (36) | Referent | 3·3 (19) | Referent | 0·32 (0·01–10·6), p = 0·522 |
Long distance destination | 29·3 (145) | 2·62 (0·76–9·05), p = 0·129 | 18·3 (192) | 3·79 (0·24–60·8), p = 0·346 | 0·28 (0·10–0·78), p = 0·015 |