Table 3 Effects of migration on intention to family planning use among women currently not using contraceptives by volume of migration
From: Migration and family planning in the state with highest total fertility rate in India
Characteristics | Low male out-migration area (LMA) | High male out-migration area (HMA) | HMA vs LMA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
%(N) | AOR (95% CI), p-value€ | %(N) | AOR (95% CI), p-value€ | AOR (95% CI), p-value€ | |
Overall | 23·9 (446) | 27·3 (491) | 1·23 (0·81–1·87), p = 0·330 | ||
Migration status of husband | |||||
Resident | 26·6 (175) | Referent | 23·4 (207) | Referent | 1·04 (0·67–1·61), p = 0·878 |
Migrant | 31·8 (129) | 1·46 (0·84–2·54), p = 0·178 | 36·6 (180) | 1·83 (1·12–2·99), p = 0·015 | 1·25 (0·75–2·08), p = 0·387 |
Frequency of husband’s home visita | |||||
Infrequent (Once or less in a year) | 25·3 (43) | Referent | 31·7 (72) | Referent | 3·51 (0·32–38·9), p = 0·306 |
Frequent (Multiple visits within a year) | 35·1 (86) | 1·62 (0·58–4·56), p = 0·357 | 39·9 (108) | 1·19 (0·60–2·35), p = 0·617 | 1·81 (0·70–4·70), p = 0·222 |
Number of days husband stays during home visitsa | |||||
< 30 days | 30·4 (77) | 1·29 (0·52–3·18), p = 0·581 | 45·4 (87) | 2·14 (1·10–4·14), p = 0·025 | 4·49 (1·05–19·3), p = 0·043 |
30+ days | 33·9 (52) | Referent | 28·4 (93) | Referent | 1·03 (0·21–4·98), p = 0·973 |
Destination where husband is currently workinga | |||||
Short distance destination | 30·8 (25) | Referent | 39·3 (13) | Referent | 0·76 (0·11–5·15), p = 0·774 |
Long distance destination | 32·0 (104) | 1·19 (0·36–3·97), p = 0·771 | 36·4 (167) | 0·88 (0·23–3·33), p = 0·854 | 1·23 (0·70–2·16), p = 0·475 |