Table 2 Effects of migration on modern contraceptive use among women by volume of migration
From: Migration and family planning in the state with highest total fertility rate in India
Characteristics | Low male out-migration area (LMA) | High male out-migration area (HMA) | HMA vs LMA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
%(N) | AOR (95% CI), p-value€ | %(N) | AOR (95% CI), p-value€ | AOR (95% CI), p-value€ | |
Overall | 32·0 (446) | 21·2 (491) | 0·58 (0·35–0·95), p = 0·030 | ||
Migration status of husband | |||||
Resident | 34·3 (266) | Referent | 26·0 (280) | Referent | 0·57 (0·36–0·91), p = 0·020 |
Migrant | 28·7 (180) | 0·51 (0·31–0·85), p = 0·009 | 14·7 (211) | 0·43 (0·26–0·73), p = 0·002 | 0·43 (0·15–1·27), p = 0·128 |
Frequency of husband’s home visita | |||||
Infrequent (Once or less in a year) | 30·3 (62) | Referent | 13·6 (84) | Referent | 0·27 (0·08–0·91), p = 0·034 |
Frequent (Multiple visits within a year) | 27·8 (118) | 0·57 (0·24–1·36), p = 0·203 | 15·4 (127) | 1·65 (0·62–4·43), p = 0·317 | 0·64 (0·31–1·31), p = 0·222 |
Number of days husband stays during home visitsa | |||||
< 30 days | 27·0 (105) | 0·76 (0·34–1·67), p = 0·491 | 10·0 (97) | 0·52 (0·20–1·37), p = 0·187 | 0·38 (0·16–0·94), p = 0·036 |
30+ days | 31·0 (75) | Referent | 18·7 (114) | Referent | 0·50 (0·21–1·21), p = 0·125 |
Destination where husband has been workinga | |||||
Short distance destination | 30·6 (36) | Referent | 33·2 (19) | Referent | 1·62 (0·09–30·1), p = 0·748 |
Long distance destination | 28·2 (145) | 1·52 (0·56–4·16), p = 0·413 | 12·9 (192) | 0·46 (0·14–1·52), p = 0·201 | 0·41 (0·13–1·28), p = 0·126 |