Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | BMC Public Health

Fig. 3

From: Coverage outcomes (effects), costs, cost-effectiveness, and equity of two combinations of long-lasting insecticidal net (LLIN) distribution channels in Kenya: a two-arm study under operational conditions

Fig. 3

Cost-effectiveness of achieving universal coverage for long-lasting insecticidal nets by study arm. Panel a (Top): Cost-effectiveness ratios for intervention, control and pooled sample. Panel b (Bottom): Cost-effectiveness plane showing incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) comparing intervention with control channels. Panel a: Error bars show lower and upper bounds of cost-effectiveness calculated using the upper and lower confidence intervals on household long-lasting insecticidal net coverage. Cost-effectiveness excluding CO costs shown in {}. Panel b: Origin represents the control channels. Quadrant 1 on the cost-effectiveness plane represents a more effective and more expensive intervention; Quadrant 2 represents a less effective and more expensive intervention; Quadrant 3 represents a less effective and less expensive intervention and Quadrant 4 represents a more effective and less expensive intervention

Back to article page

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us