|
Primary outcomes
|
Crude modela
|
Adjusted modelb
|
|---|
|
Intervention vs control condition
|
Intervention vs control condition
|
|---|
|
B (95% CI)
|
B (95% CI)
|
|---|
|
Days of sickness absence in past 8 weeks
|
-0.71 (−1.77;0.35)
|
-1.13 (-2.22;-0.05)
|
| |
OR (95% CI)
|
OR (95% CI)
|
|
Education fit (yes/a bit)c
|
4.37 (1.25; 15.25)
|
3.61 (0.98;13.31)
|
|
School performance (very good/good)d
|
1.81 (0.81; 4.07)
|
1.77 (0.78; 4.03)
|
- Note: bold numbers indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05) between the intervention condition and the control condition, calculated using linear or logistic regression models with the control condition as reference
- aModel of follow-up score with correction for corresponding baseline score, without correction for confounders
- bModel of follow-up score with correction for corresponding baseline score, intermediate vocational education level and gender
- cMeasured on a 5-point Likert scale, dichotomized into ‘yes’ (i.e. ‘yes’ and ‘a bit’) and ‘no’ (i.e. ‘I do not know-no’)
- dMeasured on a 5-point Likert scale, dichotomized into ‘good’ (i.e. ‘very good’ and ‘good’) and ‘not good’ (i.e. ‘average and less’)
- Missings: Baseline days of sickness absence in past eight weeks = 8, follow-up days of sickness absence in past eight weeks = 20; baseline education fit = 9, follow-up education fit = 23; Baseline school performance = 8, follow-up school performance = 23; intermediate vocational education level = 8; gender = 0
