Skip to main content

Table 2 Participant characteristics stratified by risk level of developing type 2 diabetes

From: A digital lifestyle behaviour change intervention for the prevention of type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study exploring intuitive engagement with real-time glucose and physical activity feedback

Pseudonym

Gender

Age range

Group allocation

Moderate risk of developing type 2 diabetesa

 Alice

Female

61–65

Group 3b

 Anne

Female

46–50

Group 3

 Arthur

Male

51–55

Group 2c

 Charles

Male

51–55

Group 1d

 Ellie

Female

46–50

Group 3

 Evie

Female

51–55

Group 3

 George

Male

56–60

Group 2

 Isabelle

Female

66–70

Group 1

 Jane

Female

36–40

Group 1

 Jennifer

Female

56–60

Group 3

 Joseph

Male

56–60

Group 3

 Leah

Female

51–55

Group 2

 Lily

Female

61–65

Group 3

 Lucas

Male

51–55

Group 3

 Lucy

Female

46–50

Group 2

 Phoebe

Female

61–65

Group 2

 Rosie

Female

41–45

Group 2

 Sarah

Female

46–50

Group 3

 Sophie

Female

61–65

Group 3

 Steven

Male

61–65

Group 2

 Theo

Male

61–65

Group 1

 Thomas

Male

66–70

Group 1

High risk of developing type 2 diabetese

 Emily

Female

56–60

Group 2

 Emma

Female

61–65

Group 3

 Henry

Male

51–55

Group 1

 Noah

Male

71–75

Group 1

  1. aModerate risk defined as a score of 16–24 points
  2. bGroup 3 could access feedback from both the glucose sensor and activity monitor for all of the six weeks;
  3. cGroup 2: participants could access feedback from the activity monitor for all of the six weeks but were also able to access feedback from the glucose sensor in the final two weeks;
  4. dGroup 1: participants could access feedback from the glucose sensor for all of the six weeks but were also able to access feedback from the activity monitor in the final two weeks
  5. eHigh risk defined as a score of 25–47 points