Skip to main content

Table 4 Respondent characteristics, knowledge and practice adherence status associated with being classified as having high concern for tick-borne diseases

From: Tickborne disease awareness and protective practices among U.S. Forest Service employees from the upper Midwest, USA

 

n

High Concern, n (%)

Odds ratio

(95% CI)

Adjusted OR

(95% CI)

Sex

 Male

61

35 (57)

0.88 (0.37–2.07)

1.49 (0.49–4.51)

 Female

33

20 (61)

1.0

 

Age group

  ≥ 46 years

41

21 (51)

0.57 (0.25–1.31)

0.10 (0.03–0.41)

  < 46 years

54

35 (65)

1.0

 

Years in current job

  > 10 years

70

48 (69)

4.64 (1.74–12.36)

18.82 (4.11–86.17)

  ≤ 10 years

25

8 (32)

1.0

 

Time spent working outdoors

  > 20 h/week

46

25 (54)

0.69 (0.30–1.57)

0.68 (0.24–2.00)

  ≤ 20 h/week

49

31 (63)

1.0

 

TBD diagnosis

 Yes

25

16 (64)

1.73 (0.52–3.43)

0.65 (0.18–2.33)

 No

70

40 (57)

1.0

 

Tick exposure

 High

71

42 (59)

0.93 (0.36–2.44)

0.49 (0.14–1.78)

 Low

23

14 (61)

1.0

 

Knowledge

 High

71

44 (62)

1.63 (0.64–4.14)

1.98 (0.61–6.36)

 Low

24

12 (50)

1.0

 

Practice adherence

 High

61

43 (70)

3.86 (1.59–9.34)

7.56 (2.20–26.05)

 Low

34

13 (38)

1.0

 
  1. Odds ratios (95% CIs) were estimated in univariate logistic regression models and aORs (95% CIs) were based on multivariate logistic regression models that included all of the respondent factors listed as explanatory variables