Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of our disease models from the multivariate logistic regression after controlling for the defined parameters within Bhutan

From: Evaluating the effect of village health workers on hospital admission rates and their economic impact in the Kingdom of Bhutan

Disease Models

OR for Village Health Worker (VHW) Count

97·5% Confidence Interval

p-value

Pseudo-R2

(McFadden’s)

Deviance (G2)

Conjunctivitis

0.9997

(0.9989, 1.0005)

ns

0.65

16095***

Diarrhea

0.9885

(0.9879, 0.9890)

P < .001

0.74

324756***

Dysentery

0.9807

(0.9790, 0.9824)

P < .001

0.63

4505***

Wound Care

0.9848

(0.9843, 0.9853)

P < .001

0.78

49345***

Scabies

0.9998

(0.9985, 1.0011)

ns

0.64

6639***

Depression/Anxiety

0.9637

(0.9615, 0.9660)

P < .001

0.65

4050***

Dental Caries

0.9704

(0.9699, 0.9708)

P < .001

0.54

50493***

Skin Infections

0.9909

(0.9905, 0.9914)

P < .001

0.72

60077***

  1. P-Value for Deviance Goodness-of-Fit Test:
  2. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001
  3. Table 1 shows that after adjusting for other covariates, our logit models indicate that an average one unit increase of VHWs per health center is associated with a decrease in hospital/clinic admission for diarrhea (OR 0.9885, 97.5%CI 0.9879, 0.9890), dysentery (OR 0.9807, 97.5%CI 0.9790, 0.9824), wound care (OR 0.9848, 97.5%CI 0.9843, 0.9853), depression/anxiety (OR 0.9637, 97.5%CI 0.9615, 0.9660), dental caries (OR 0.9704, 97.5%CI 0.9699, 0.9708), and skin infection (OR 0.9909, 97.5%CI 0.9905, 0.9914), while a non-significant increase was observed for scabies (OR 0.9998, 97.5%CI 0.9985, 10,011) and conjunctivitis (OR 0.9997, 97.5%CI 0.9989, 1.0005). For model fit, Table 1 details key fit descriptors by reporting the McFadden’s Pseudo-R2 and deviance statistics for each of the models. The deviance statistics were all significant, thereby indicating that our models were superior to their null (intercept-only) counterparts. Lastly, the high McFadden’s Pseudo-R2 values also indicates that the model is well fit. The level of signifcane for each of the deviance tests is reflected by * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001