Table 3 Association between factors during implementation and sitting time at 3 months follow-up compared to baseline. Intervention group only (n = 173).
Variable | When | Category | n (%) | Coef. | 95% CI | p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Context | Concurrent institutional changes | Interviews | Yes | 67 (50) | 23 | -10 | 55 | 0.171 |
Initiation of the intervention | Initiation (participants influenced initiation) | Interviews | Yes | 87 (65) | 5 | −38 | 47 | 0.826 |
Drivers of change | Management support | 1 month | High/very high | 98 (77) | −1 | −27 | 25 | 0.950 |
3 months | High/very high | 89 (67) | −16 | −40 | 8 | 0.191 | ||
Active ambassador | Interviews | Yes | 58 (43) | 5 | −39 | 48 | 0.836 | |
Readiness for change | Desire to change sitting | Baseline | Strong/very strong | 65 (49) | 0 | −21 | 21 | 0.985 |
1 month | Strong/very strong | 79 (62) | −35 | −56 | −15 | 0.001 | ||
3 months | Strong/very strong | 72 (56) | −31 | −53 | −9 | 0.005 | ||
Need for project with focus on sitting time | Baseline | Strong/very strong | 63 (48) | −9 | −31 | 12 | 0.393 | |
Changes in mental models | Motivation for ‘Take a Stand!’ | 1 month | Strong/very strong | 87 (68) | −34 | −55 | −13 | 0.002 |
3 months | Strong/very strong | 73 (57) | −36 | −57 | −16 | 0.001 | ||
Sense of collective engagement concerning ‘Take a Stand!’ | 1 month | High/very high | 64 (50) | 3 | −21 | 26 | 0.831 | |
3 months | High/very high | 60 (47) | −28 | −50 | −6 | 0.011 | ||
Mutual support at the office | 3 months | Totally/partly agree | 93 (72) | −17 | −42 | 8 | 0.175 | |
Focus on common goals | Interviews | Yes | 101 (75) | 19 | −14 | 51 | 0.255 | |
‘Take a Stand!’ has contributed to a positive atmosphere | 3 months | Totally/partly agree | 85 (66) | −14 | −37 | 10 | 0.246 | |
‘Take a Stand!’ has contributed to positive experiences in the office | 3 months | Totally/partly agree | 81 (63) | −8 | −31 | 15 | 0.476 | |
Non participants (influenced project) | Interviews | Yes | 42 (31) | −3 | −31 | 26 | 0.864 | |