Skip to main content

Table 3 Included NRT studies

From: Inequalities, harm reduction and non-combustible nicotine products: a meta-ethnography of qualitative evidence

Study

Location

Participants

Methods

SES

Study period

Study aims

Atkinson et al. 2013 [51]

Nottingham, UK

36, smokers, parents of young children, 16yo and over, 28 female

Interviews

Recruitment from socially disadvantaged areas

2009

To explore the uses and perception of NRT by disadvantaged parents, especially in relation to temporary smoking abstinence in the home.

Bonevski et al. 2011 [45]

Bryant et al. 2010 [46]

Bryant et al. 2011 [47]

New South Wales, Australia

32, smokers, 16yo+, 22 female

6 focus groups of 3–8

Users of community welfare services

2008–2009

To explore the barriers and opportunities for smoking cessation for disadvantaged smokers.

Roddy et al. 2006 [52]

Nottingham,UK

39, smokers, 27-77yo, 33 male

9 Focus groups of 2–7

Local indicator of SES (Townsend score)

Unclear

To identify barriers or motivators among disadvantaged smokers to accessing smoking cessation services.

Wiltshire et al. 2003 [53]

Two sites in Edinburgh, UK

100 smokers, 25-40yo, 50 female

Interviews

Recruitment from socially disadvantaged areas

1999–2000

To investigate the perceptions and experiences of quitting among smokers from disadvantaged areas