Contextual effects of social integration and disintegration on health status: evidence from South Korea

BMC Public Health

Table 3 Multilevel model analyses affecting low-SRH status ^a

Model parameter		Model I (unconditional)		Model II (unconditional slope)		Model III (conditional)
Model parameter		OR	95% CI	OR	95% CI	OR	95% CI
Level 1	Intercept, γ₀₀	0.619	(0.586–0.654)	0.585	(0.551–0.620)	0.584	(0.551–0.618)
	Social Communication			0.612^e	(0.576–0.650)	0.611^e	(0.576–0.649)
	Political Participation			1.110^e	(1.046–1.170)	1.107^e	(1.046–1.170)
	Social Participation (neighbors)			1.132^e	(1.065–1.203)	1.132^e	(1.065–1.204)
	Social Participation (organizations)			0.855^e	(0.807–0.905)	0.853^e	(0.806–0.905)
	Social Inclusion (in-network)			0.798^e	(0.752–0.846)	0.797^e	(0.752–0.846)
	Social Inclusion (out-of-network)			0.689^e	(0.652–0.727)	0.687^e	(0.650–0.726)
Level 2^b	NBMI					1.071^c	(1.001–1.145)
	GRDP					0.917^c	(0.839–0.993)
	TFR					0.985	(0.924–1.051)
	NFMC					1.096^c	(1.038–1.240)
	ROPH					0.989^c	(0.882–0.990)

^aThe gender, age, education, income, and residence type (city districts) of the respondents were adjusted
^bNBMI (the number of beds of medical institution per 1000 people; GRDP (gross regional domestic product); TFR (the total fertility rate); NFMC (the number of four major crime); ROPH (the ratio of one-person households)
^c: p < 0.05; ^d: p < 0.01; ^ee: p < 0.001

ISSN: 1471-2458