Skip to main content

Table 1 Process indicators disaggregated by human resource model

From: A comparative impact evaluation of two human resource models for community-based active tuberculosis case finding in Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam

 

Total

N (%)

Volunteer ACF

N (%)

Employee ACF

N (%)

Individuals verbally screened

321,020 (100.0)

100,025 (100.0)

220,995 (100.0)

Individuals consenting & recruiteda

70,439 (21.9)

34,129 (34.1)

36,310 (16.4)

Individuals eligible for CXR

59,781 (18.6)

29,438 (29.4)

30,343 (13.7)

Individuals screened by CXR

43,910 (13.7)

20,602 (20.6)

23,308 (10.5)

Individuals with abnormal CXR screen

5106 (1.6)

2484 (2.5)

2622 (1.2)

Individuals tested for TB (any sputum test)

18,351 (5.7)

9071 (9.1)

9280 (4.2)

 Individuals tested for TB with Xpert

3567 (1.1)

1992 (2.0)

1575 (0.7)

 Individuals tested for TB with Smear

14,781 (4.6)

7078 (7.1)

7703 (3.5)

 Individuals tested for TB with Culture

3 (0.0)

1 (0.0)

2 (0.0)

Individuals diagnosed with All Forms TB

1306 (0.4)

724 (0.7)

582 (0.3)

 Individuals diagnosed Xpert(+)

511 (0.2)

269 (0.3)

242 (0.1)

 Individuals diagnosed Smear(+)

733 (0.2)

411 (0.4)

322 (0.1)

 Individuals diagnosed Culture(+)

3 (< 0.1)

1 (< 0.1)

2 (< 0.1)

 Individuals clinically diagnosedb

59 (< 0.1)

43 (< 0.1)

16 (< 0.1)

All Forms TB patients started on treatment

1138 (0.4)

628 (0.6)

510 (0.2)

NNS / Yield

282 (0.4)

159 (0.6)

433 (0.2)

  1. aComprised of household contacts and symptomatic persons from other target groups that consented to participate in the study;
  2. bIncludes extrapulmonary TB