Table 1 Numbers of districts, villages, respondents (N = 626), numbers of respondents who reported bat contact (n = 228), and number of respondents who reported bat consumption (n = 96)
From: Risk factors for bat contact and consumption behaviors in Thailand; a quantitative study
| Â | Â | Â | Â | No. of respondents (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Regions | Provinces | No. of districts | No. of villages | No. of respondents | Reported bat contact | Reported bat consumption |
Northern | Chiang Mai | 1 | 4 | 80 (12.78%) | 28 (12.28%) | 27 (28.13%) |
Northern | Chiang Rai | 1 | 2 | 60 (9.58%) | 20 (8.77%) | 13 (13.54%) |
Central | Ang Thong | 1 | 1 | 64 (10.22%) | 26 (11.40%) | 0 (0.00%) |
Central | Ayutthaya | 1 | 1 | 60 (9.58%) | 24 (10.53%) | 1 (1.04%) |
Central | Lopburi | 3 | 4 | 77 (33.77%) | 25 (10.96%) | 1 (1.04%) |
Central | Saraburi | 1 | 1 | 42 (6.71%) | 21 (9.21%) | 3 (3.13%) |
Northeastern | Khon Kaen | 4 | 8 | 69 (11.02%) | 21 (9.21%) | 3 (3.13%) |
Northeastern | Ubon Ratchathani | 1 | 1 | 60 (9.58%) | 24 (10.53%) | 18 (18.75%) |
Southern | Krabi | 1 | 2 | 60 (9.58%) | 19 (8.33%) | 14 (14.58%) |
Southern | Surat Thani | 5 | 13 | 54 (8.63%) | 20 (8.77%) | 16 (16.67%) |
| Â | Â | 19 | 37 | 626 (100%) | 228 (100%) | 96 (100%) |