Source(s) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Qualitative Finding/Rationale | Intervention Adaptation | FGD | KID |
Intervention adaptation leadership field team (Mashinani) | Pilot |
App Content | |||||
Leaving relationship safely not considered feasible in this setting | Emphasis on harm reduction strategies for “staying safely” in relationship | X | |||
Strong local preference and pressure to endure violence | X | ||||
Cultural norms and relationship dynamics with in-laws and natal families | Development of temporary leaving strategies to natal family home and in-law home | X | X | ||
Permanent separation from partner not considered feasible in this context | X | X | |||
Preference for short-term options that do not compromise family status in the community | X | ||||
Parental stress over children exposed to violence | Addition of age-specific child safety strategies, and sexual/reproductive health safety strategies | X | |||
Distinct cultural and tribal norms around child custody | X | X | X | ||
Concern for risks and harms incurred during pregnancy | X | ||||
Pressure specific to childbearing and care for children | X | X | |||
Fear of community stigma around violence | Modification of ‘priorities’, ‘healthy relationships’, and ‘harmful beliefs about abuse’ section of the app to reflect those in this context | X | |||
Pressure specific to childbearing and care for children | X | X | |||
Common beliefs and myths regarding healthy and unhealthy relationships in this context | X | X | X | ||
Participant challenges interpreting the danger assessment (homicide risk assessment) | Danger assessment result presented to participants as a binary (increased danger vs. variable danger) for simplicity | X | |||
App Interface | |||||
Time needed to review and complete each app component app negatively impacted feasibility and engagement | Components of app re-organized and shortened where possible | X | X | ||
Preference to use sliding scale for ordering personal priorities | Rank system removed and replaced with sliding scale for ordering personal priorities | X | |||
Wide range of literacy including low literacy | Inclusion of graphics and short animations | X | X | ||
App Implementation | |||||
Women’s familiarity with apps is limited though growing | Community health volunteers (CHVs) trained to facilitate app implementation | X | X | X | |
Women may lack confidential space to use the phone without arousing suspicion | X | ||||
Phone-sharing is common | X | ||||
Quality of phones and ability to support apps is limited in some areas, though expanding | X | X |