Skip to main content

Table 5 The number and proportion of products exceeding Health Canada’s “high in” nutrient thresholds (≥15% Daily Value) for proposed front-of-pack (FOP) labelling regulations and would therefore be required to bear ≥1 FOP symbols for sodium, saturated fat and/or total sugars

From: A comparison of the nutritional quality of products offered by the top packaged food and beverage companies in Canada

Company

Total products na

Eligible products nb

≥1 FOP symbol

Sodium

Saturated fat

Total sugars

n

%c

n

%c

n

%c

n

%c

A. Lassonde

77

77

61

79.2

1

1.3

0

0.0

60

77.9

Agropur

123

115

90

73.2

19

15.4

48

39.0

42

34.1

Campbell Soup

222

221

191

86.0

162

73.0

32

14.4

33

14.9

Canada Bread

96

96

37

38.5

13

13.5

25

26.0

17

17.7

Canada Dry Mott’s

64

62

39

60.9

9

14.1

0

0.0

30

46.9

Coca-Cola

138

138

113

81.9

9

6.5

1

0.7

108

78.3

Danone

132

132

103

78.0

0

0.0

35

26.5

86

65.2

General Mills

382

378

295

77.2

97

25.4

105

27.5

175

45.8

George Weston

169

169

95

56.2

79

46.7

12

7.1

13

7.7

Kellogg

138

138

84

60.9

26

18.8

32

23.2

37

26.8

Kraft Heinz

460

460

345

75.0

260

56.5

117

25.4

66

14.3

Loblaw

3099

2935

1867

60.2

941

30.4

866

27.9

694

22.4

Maple Leaf Foods

158

158

154

97.5

143

90.5

84

53.2

13

8.2

Mondelēz

227

227

142

62.6

31

13.7

83

36.6

105

46.3

Nestlé

313

309

249

79.6

78

24.9

168

53.7

163

52.1

Ocean Spray Cranberries

38

38

26

68.4

0

0.0

1

2.6

26

68.4

Parmalat

120

120

106

88.3

28

23.3

82

68.3

39

32.5

PepsiCo

340

337

166

48.8

67

19.7

33

9.7

94

27.6

Saputo

95

87

73

76.8

25

26.3

60

63.2

23

24.2

Sobeys

1633

1545

1073

65.7

543

33.3

508

31.1

435

26.6

Sun-Rype

36

36

31

86.1

0

0.0

0

0.0

31

86.1

Unilever

217

217

158

72.8

91

41.9

53

24.4

64

29.5

TOTAL

8277

7995

5498

66.4

2622

31.7

2345

28.3

2354

28.4

  1. aTotal number of products offered by the company - overall or within a given food category – irrespective of whether a product was exempt from Health Canada’s proposed requirement to display a FOP nutrition symbol
  2. bNumber of products offered by the company – overall or within a given food category – that would be eligible for evaluation against the proposed thresholds for displaying a FOP nutrition symbol (i.e., products that did not qualify for exemption)
  3. cDenominator consists of all products offered by the company (including those that would be exempt from the requirement to display a FOP nutrition symbol)