Nutrient patterns and cardiometabolic risk factors among Iranian adults: Tehran lipid and glucose study

Mottaghian, Mohammad; Salehi, Pantea; Teymoori, Farshad; Mirmiran, Parvin; Hosseini-Esfahani, Firoozeh; Azizi, Fereidoun

doi:10.1186/s12889-020-08767-6

BMC Public Health

Table 4 Multiple linear regression analysis evaluating the association between each quartile increase of nutrient patterns and changes in fasting blood sugar, systolic and diastolic blood pressure after three years of follow up in 1637 participants of the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study

From: Nutrient patterns and cardiometabolic risk factors among Iranian adults: Tehran lipid and glucose study

	Fasting blood sugar changes		Systolic blood pressure changes		Diastolic blood pressure changes
	β^a(95% CI)	P value	β (95% CI)	P value	β (95% CI)	P value
Pattern 1
Model1^b	0.894 (− 0.056, 1.843)	0.065	− 0.210 (− 0.750, 0.323)	0.444	− 0.149 (− 0.532, 0.234)	0.446
Model2^c	0.791 (− 0.159, 1.742)	0.103	− 0.336 (− 0.900, 0.167)	0.178	− 0.264 (− 0.643, 0.115)	0.172
Model3^d	0.659 (− 0.298, 1.615)	0.177	− 0.320 (− 0.817, 0.176)	0.206	− 0.205 (− 0.550, 0.140)	0.243
Pattern 2
Model1^b	− 0.221 (−1.163, 0.720)	0.645	− 0.205 (− 0.743, 0.334)	0.456	−0.110 (− 0.492, 0.273)	0.574
Model2^c	−0.217 (− 1.157, 0.723)	0.651	− 0.195 (− 0.726, 0.337)	0.472	−0.114 (− 0.492, 0.263)	0.552
Model3^d	−0.019 (− 0.973, 0.937)	0.968	−0.210 (− 0.710, 0.291)	0.411	−0.188 (− 0.536, 0.160)	0.289
Pattern 3
Model1^b	0.146 (−0.804, 1.095)	0.763	0.113 (−0.429, 0.655)	0.683	0.056 (−0.328, 0.441)	0.774
Model2^c	0.152 (−0.795, 1.099)	0.753	0.100 (−0.434, 0.634)	0.713	0.059 (−0.328, 0.431)	0.789
Model3^d	0.140 (−0.806, 1.086)	0.772	0.122 (−0.372, 0.615)	0.629	0.068 (−0.275, 0.412)	0.695
Pattern 4
Model1^b	0.064 (−0.889, 1.017)	0.895	−0.174 (− 0.719, 0.372)	0.533	− 0.150 (− 0.538, 0.238)	0.448
Model2^c	0.123 (− 0.828, 1.074)	0.800	− 0.113 (− 0.651, 0.425)	0.680	− 0.097 (− 0.479, 0.286)	0.620
Model3^d	0.047 (− 0.904, 0.999)	0.922	−0.147 (− 0.644, 0.351)	0.563	− 0.068 (− 0.414, 0.279)	0.702
Pattern 5
Model1^b	−0.026 (− 0.988, 0.935)	0.957	0.085 (− 0.465, 0.635)	0.762	0.036 (− 0.354, 0.426)	0.857
Model2^c	−0.108(− 1.069, 0.853)	0.825	− 0.002 (− 0.545, 0.540)	0.993	−0.032 (− 0.417, 0.354)	0.871
Model3^d	−0.166 (− 1.128, 0.796)	0.735	− 0.089 (− 0.592, 0.413)	0.727	− 0.099 (− 0.448, 0.250)	0.579

^a Beta regression coefficient; the positive β values indicated that higher adherence to nutrient patterns increases the changes in dependent variables and vice versa
^bAdjusted for age and sex
^cAdjusted for model 1 and body mass index, physical activity, and smoking (yes or no)
^d Adjusted for model 2 and energy intake, education levels (under diploma, diploma and associate degree, bachelor and higher), marital status (single, married), and employment status (employed, unemployed). For blood pressure and fasting blood sugar changes, their corresponding values in baseline phase were adjusted

Back to article page

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us

Submission enquiries: bmcpublichealth@biomedcentral.com
General enquiries: ORSupport@springernature.com