Skip to main content

Table 3 Estimating the impact of occupational stress on depression: Modified Poisson regression with CEM

From: The effect of occupational stress on depression and insomnia: a cross-sectional study among employees in a Ghanaian telecommunication company

Variables

Depression

Poisson regression with CEM

Sensitivity Analysis

Ordinary Poisson regression analysis

Logistic regression analysis

Probit regression analysis

RR [95% CI]

RR [95% CI]

OR [95% CI]

β [95% CI]

Occupational stress

Low

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

Excessive

1.03 [0.91–1.17]

1.05 [0.94–1.17]

1.43 [0.61–3.39]

0.23[− 0.25–0.71]

Age groups

 18–29 years

a

Ref

Ref

Ref

 30–49 years

 

0.95 [0.81–1.12]

0.83 [0.27–2.52]

− 0.07[− 0.69–0.55]

Sex

 Males

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

 Females

1.20 [1.06–1.36]

1.11 [0.99–1.24]

2.11 [0.96–4.67]

0.42 [0.02–0.86]

Marital status

 Married

a

Ref

Ref

Ref

 Single

 

1.28 [1.03–1.59]*

4.04 [1.22–13.33]*

0.78 [0.10–1.46]*

Dependents

 No

a

Ref

Ref

Ref

 Yes

 

1.10 [0.91–1.34]

1.61 [0.53–4.92]

0.27[−0.36–0.91]

Employment

 Permanent

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

 Contract

1.14 [1.01–1.29]

1.11 [0.99–1.26]

2.43 [0.88–6.65]

0.50[− 0.04–1.05]

Job ranking

 Other

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

 Superior

1.08 [0.94–1.23]

1.13 [0.95–1.34]

1.99 [0.68–5.82]

0.39[− 0.21–0.99]

Hours per week

 Regular

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

 Overtime

1.06 [0.94–1.21]

0.96 [0.86–1.07]

0.74 [0.34–1.60]

−0.12[− 0.54–0.31]

Work experience

a

1.02 [1.00–1.04]

1.13 [0.96–1.33]

0.07[−0.02–0.16]

Alcohol intake

 No

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

 Yes

1.13 [0.97–1.33]

1.11 [0.98–1.25]

2.23 [0.59–8.37]

0.7[−0.24–1.17]

  1. P-value notation: ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05
  2. a: these variables were excluded from the model due to CEM