Skip to main content

Table 4 Categorization of the videos according to Category, sources and characteristics [n (%)]

From: YouTube™ as a source of information for Candida auris infection: a systematic review

 

Poor (n = 31)

Good (n = 31)

Excellent (n = 14)

Total

χ2

p value

Category

 Educational video

8

10

11

29

12.15

0.0023

 Entertainment

0

0

0

0

 News & Politics

7

6

0

13

3.37

0.1608

 Interview & Blogs

15

15

3

33

3.38

0.1846

 Others

1

0

0

1

1.47

0.4793

Source

 government/news agencies

10

13

4

27

1.00

0.6077

 Universities/professional organizations/non-profit

9

6

4

19

0.89

0.6405

 physician/physician groups

0

0

0

 

 Stand-alone health information websites

3

2

3

8

2.34

0.3108

 Medical advertisement/for profit companies

1

1

0

2

0.46

0.7930

 Individual

8

9

3

20

0.29

0.8630

 others

0

0

0

0

Characteristics

 patients

0

0

0

0

 patient’s family or caregiver

0

0

0

0

 physicians

11

16

9

36

3.59

0.1663

 nurses

0

0

0

0

 reporter

6

5

1

12

1.09

0.5809

 social individual

6

8

2

16

0.86

0.6502

 others

8

2

2

12

4.10

0.1110