Table 3 Comparison of the video parameters between the poor, good and excellent groups (median [quartile range])
From: YouTube™ as a source of information for Candida auris infection: a systematic review
Poor (n = 31) | Good (n = 31) | Excellent (n = 14) | F | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
length (min) | 1.80 (1.10–4.40) | 5.50 (2.50–14.50) | 24.80 (13.20–54.00) | 24.73 | < 0.0001 |
like | 6.00 (2.00–99.00) | 19.00 (4.00–69.00) | 22.50 (2.80–163.80) | 0.19 | 0.8274 |
dislike | 0 (0–3.00) | 1.00 (0–5.00) | 1.00 (0–24.50) | 0.31 | 0.7323 |
view | 838.00 (293.00–4826.00) | 1130.00 (234.00–4567.00) | 1997.00 (777.50–17,340.80) | 0.33 | 0.7214 |
Posted days | 166.00 (163.00–813.00) | 164.00 (157.00–165.00) | 166.50 (138.50–808.30) | 3.35 | 0.0407 |
comments | 2.00 (0–53.00) | 9.00 (1.00–26.00) | 4.0 (1.00–196.80) | 1.12 | 0.3315 |
percentage positivity | 0.98 (0.90–1.00) | 0.96 (0.88–1.00) | 0.96 (0.92–1.00) | 0.79 | 0.4584 |
likebility | 0.04 (0.004–0.61) | 0.09 (0.02–0.42) | 0.03 (0.02–1.00) | 0.67 | 0.5125 |
view rate | 2.25 (0.85–29.79) | 6.33 (1.43–26.10) | 2.97 (0.82–108.14) | 0.91 | 0.4063 |
viewers’ interaction | 0.01 (0.004–0.03) | 0.02 (0.008–0.02) | 0.01 (0.009–0.034) | 0.27 | 0.7624 |
Total Views/day | 47.12 | 31.96 | 13.94 | ||
Total duration (seconds [%]) | 7902.00 (15.42) | 17,971.00 (35.07) | 25,372.00 (49.51) | ||
Total views (n [%]) | 372,376.00 (28.70) | 571,214.00 (44.03) | 353,710.00 (27.27) |