Table 2 DISCERN Reliability Tool (1 point per question if answered yes)
From: YouTube™ as a source of information for Candida auris infection: a systematic review
1. Are the explanations given in the video clear and understandable? | |
2. Are useful reference sources given? (publication cited, from valid studies) | |
3. Is the information in the video balanced and neutral? | |
4. Are additional sources of information given from which the viewer can benefit? | |
5. Does the video evaluate areas that are controversial or uncertain? |