Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of two groups of patients on decisional balance, the process of change, self-efficacy and depression after intervention

From: Effects of a transtheoretical model - based intervention and motivational interviewing on the management of depression in hospitalized patients with coronary heart disease: a randomized controlled trial

Items

Analysis of covariance

Adjusted mean (95%CI)

Intervention (n = 48)

(\( \overline{\mathrm{X}} \) ± s)

Control (n = 55)

(\( \overline{\mathrm{X}} \) ± s)

F (df)

P

Intervention (n = 48)

Control (n = 55)

Decisional balance

 Perceived benefits

10.19 ± 2.10

8.73 ± 1.13

33.641 (1.000)

0.000**

10.20 (9.83, 10.57)

8.71 (8.37, 9.06)

 Perceived barriers

6.58 ± 1.30

7.93 ± 1.12

18.995 (1.000)

0.000**

6.75 (6.42,7.09)

7.78 (7.47, 8.09)

Process of change

 Cognitive level

33.94 ± 5.57

29.35 ± 3.09

67.769 (1.000)

0.000**

34.52 (33.53, 35.51)

28.84 (27.91, 29.76)

 Behavioral level

34.44 ± 5.01

32.78 ± 2.87

42.466 (1.000)

0.000**

34.47 (35.37, 37.56)

31.01 (30.00, 32.01)

Self-efficacy

12.06 ± 2.40

10.47 ± 1.57

15.443 (1.000)

0.000**

12.00 (12.46, 12.54)

10.53 (10.02, 11.03)

Depression

18.46 ± 3.36

20.85 ± 2.28

25.515 (1.000)

0.000**

18.30 (17.53,19.07)

20.99 (20.28,21.71)

  1. **p < 0.01