Skip to main content

Table 3 Nutritional qualitya of the shopping cart across demographic and economic characteristics by allocated front-of-pack nutrition label (N = 2194)

From: Impact of front-of-pack nutrition labels on consumer purchasing intentions: a randomized experiment in low- and middle-income Mexican adults

 

GDA

MTL

WL

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

Household monthly income (MXN pesos), mean (SD)

  < $2699

1.9 (3.2)

1.2 (3.3)

1.0 (3.4)

 $2700-6799

1.7 (3.0)

1.0 (3.1)

1.3 (3.1)

 $6800-11,599

1.2 (2.7)

0.7 (3.0)

0.8 (3.3)

 $11,600-34,99

0.8 (2.7)

0.0 (2.6)

0.4 (3.0)

  > $35,000

−0.2 (2.4)

0.6 (2.6)

−0.3 (2.4)

p-trend

0.000

0.002

0.003

Education level, n (%)

 Secondary school and lower

2.1 (3.0)

1.7 (3.3)

1.8 (3.6)

 High-school

1.5 (2.9)

0.7 (2.9)

1.1 (3.3)

 Undergraduate

1.0 (2.8)

0.5 (2.9)

0.4 (2.9)

 Graduate

0.9 (2.8)

−0.2 (2.7)

−0.3 (2.5)a

p-trend

0.000

0.000

0.000

Interest in health, n (%)

 Not interested or a little interested

2.3 (3.0)

1.7 (3.1)

1.8 (2.8)

 Very interested

1.1 (2.8)

0.5 (3.0)

0.6 (3.2)

p-value

0.000

0.000

0.000

Self-reported nutritional knowledge, n (%)

 Not knowledgeable

2.3 (3.1)

1.9 (3.5)

1.9 (3.1)

 A little knowledgeable

1.4 (2.7)

1.0 (2.8)

0.8 (2.7)

 Somewhat and very knowledgeable

0.7 (2.9)

−0.1 (2.7)

0.3 (3.5)

p-trend

0.000

0.000

0.000

  1. a The nutritional quality of the shopping cart was evaluated using the NPSC model
  2. Bolds indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) with GDA for a given characteristic level
  3. P-values indicate differences or linear trends across levels of a given characteristic for the corresponding label