Variable | Proportion of disparity explained | p |
---|
Men | (ref) | (ref) |
Women | 0.17 | 0.014 |
French-born | (ref) | (ref) |
2nd Generation | 0.08 | 0.053 |
Mainland France | (ref) | (ref) |
Overseas France | 0.13 | 0.049 |
North Africa | 0.22 | < 0.001 |
Sub-Saharan Africa | 0.32 | 0.003 |
Southeast Asia | −0.03 | 0.705 |
Mixed (no FR) | 0.00 | 0.880 |
Christian | (ref) | (ref) |
Muslim | 0.26 | < 0.001 |
Buddhist | −0.03 | 0.312 |
Other Religion | 0.09 | 0.307 |
- The proportion explained is calculated from coefficients in Table 2, as (1 – (Model 1 AME / Model 2 AME)). The p value refers to statistically contrasting the AME in Model 1 and Model 2; that is, it represents a test of the null hypothesis that the proportion explained is equal to zero. Only those variables with an observed AME in Model 1 are tabulated here, as they represent baseline gaps in foregoing healthcare across demographic characteristics