Skip to main content

Table 4 General associations of perceptions of the neighbourhood environment with walking for leisure across the 3 waves (n = 2260)

From: Longitudinal associations between perceptions of the neighbourhood environment and physical activity in adolescents: evidence from the Olympic Regeneration in East London (ORiEL) study

Exposure

Unadjusted

Adjusteda

Gender-interactionb

OR

95%CI

p-value

OR

95%CI

p-value

p-value

Perceived bus stop proximity

Further away

1.00

 

0.050

1.00

 

0.086

0.760

1–5 min

0.88

[0.78,1.05]

 

0.89

[0.78,1.02]

  

Perceived traffic safety

Low

1.00

 

0.372

1.00

 

0.298

0.709

Medium

0.90

[0.75,1.08]

 

0.90

[0.75,1.09]

  

High

0.88

[0.74,1.05]

 

0.86

[0.71,1.04]

  

Perceived street connectivity

Low

1.00

 

0.149

1.00

 

0.267

0.964

Medium

1.15

[0.99,1.34]

 

1.13

[0.97,1.32]

  

High

1.10

[0.93,1.31]

 

1.09

[0.91,1.31]

  

Enjoyment of neighbourhood for walking/cycling

Strongly/slightly disagree

1.00

 

0.360

1.00

 

0.534

0.353

Slightly agree

1.02

[0.89,1.17]

 

1.02

[0.88,1.18]

  

Strongly agree

1.10

[0.95,1.27]

 

1.09

[0.92,1.29]

  

Feeling safe (personal safety)

Strongly disagree

1.00

 

0.068

1.00

 

0.034

0.881

Slightly disagree

1.28

[1.03,1.59]

 

1.28

[1.02,1.62]

  

Neither agree nor disagree

1.09

[0.88,1.34]

 

1.09

[0.87,1.36]

  

Slightly agree

1.24

[1.01,1.54]

 

1.31

[1.04,1.65]

  

Strongly agree

1.11

[0.90,1.38]

 

1.18

[0.93,1.49]

  
  1. Results are from logistic regression models estimated with Generalised Estimating Equations to account for the dependency across repeated measurements (unstructured working correlation matrix)
  2. a Adjusted for gender, ethnicity, health condition, family affluence, free school meal status at wave 1, time and the other perception variables of the table
  3. b The adjusted model was replicated for each exposure with an additional interaction term between gender and exposure