Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Perceived risk versus objectively measured risk of HIV acquisition: a cross-sectional study among HIV-negative individuals in Serodiscordant partnerships with clients attending an Urban Clinic in Uganda

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
27 Feb 2019 Submitted Original manuscript
20 May 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tewodros Getachew Hailemariam
1 Jul 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Surendra Karki
8 Aug 2019 Author responded Author comments - Lillian Tugume
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Aug 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Sep 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tewodros Getachew Hailemariam
1 Oct 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Surendra Karki
18 Oct 2019 Author responded Author comments - Lillian Tugume
Resubmission - Version 3
18 Oct 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
5 Nov 2019 Author responded Author comments - Lillian Tugume
Resubmission - Version 4
5 Nov 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
8 Nov 2019 Editorially accepted
29 Nov 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12889-019-7929-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement