Moderating role of job satisfaction on turnover intention and burnout among workers in primary care institutions: a cross-sectional study

Table 2 Comparison of different fitting indices on hypothetical model and adjusted model

Fit index	χ^{2 a}	χ²/df ^b	GFI ^c	AGF ^d	CFI ^e	NFI ^f	IFI ^g	TLI ^h	RMSEA ⁱ	AIC ^j
Optimum model	–	2–5	> 0.90	> 0.90	> 0.90	> 0.90	> 0.90	> 0.90	< 0.05	–
Hypothetical model	9695.143	27.940	0.600	0.533	0.801	0.796	0.802	0.784	0.140	9813.143
Results	–	unfit	unfit	unfit	unfit	unfit	unfit	unfit	unfit	–
Adjusted model	1157.059	5.590	0.932	0.901	0.977	0.973	0.977	0.970	0.058	1343.059
Results	–	acceptable	fit	fit	fit	fit	fit	fit	acceptable	–

Note: ^a χ2, Chi-square. ^b χ2/df, Chi-square divided by degree of freedom. ^c GFI Goodness of fit index, ^d AGFI Adjusted goodness of fit index, ^e CFI Comparative fit index, ^f NFI Normed fit index, ^g IFI Incremental fit index. ^h TLI Tucker-Lewis index. ^I RMSEA Root mean square error for approximation. ^j AIC Akaike information criterion

ISSN: 1471-2458