Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of different fitting indices on hypothetical model and adjusted model

From: Moderating role of job satisfaction on turnover intention and burnout among workers in primary care institutions: a cross-sectional study

Fit index

χ2 a

χ2/df b

GFI c

AGF d

CFI e

NFI f

IFI g

TLI h

RMSEA i

AIC j

Optimum model

–

2–5

> 0.90

> 0.90

> 0.90

> 0.90

> 0.90

> 0.90

< 0.05

–

Hypothetical model

9695.143

27.940

0.600

0.533

0.801

0.796

0.802

0.784

0.140

9813.143

Results

–

unfit

unfit

unfit

unfit

unfit

unfit

unfit

unfit

–

Adjusted model

1157.059

5.590

0.932

0.901

0.977

0.973

0.977

0.970

0.058

1343.059

Results

–

acceptable

fit

fit

fit

fit

fit

fit

acceptable

–

  1. Note: a χ2, Chi-square. b χ2/df, Chi-square divided by degree of freedom. c GFI Goodness of fit index, d AGFI Adjusted goodness of fit index, e CFI Comparative fit index, f NFI Normed fit index, g IFI Incremental fit index. h TLI Tucker-Lewis index. I RMSEA Root mean square error for approximation. j AIC Akaike information criterion