Skip to main content

Table 2 Overview of each study included in the review

From: Systematic review of the impact of nutrition claims related to fat, sugar and energy content on food choices and energy intake

Authors, Year

Setting

Country

Population (sample size, n)

Food category

Type of claim

Outcome areas of focus

Chan et al., 2005 [31]

Content analysis of transcript

AU

20–80 y/o (36)

• Any food

• Low-fat

• Food intake

• Purchases

Bialkova et al., 2016 [32]

Experimental

DE

18–64 y/o (240)

• Chipsa

• Cerealsa

• 30% less fat (chips)

• 30% less sugar (cereals) vs. no claim

• Experienced tastiness

• Purchase intentions

Mai & Hoffmann, 2015

(study 3) [33]

Experimental

DE

av. 21.3 y/o (475)

• Yogurtb

• Reduced-fat

• Reduced-sugar vs. Regular

• Health consciousness

• Perceived healthfulness

• Experienced tastiness

• Purchase intentions

Roefs & Jansen 2004 [34]

Experimental

NL

women (44)

• Milkshakea

• Low-fat vs. High-fat

• Food intake

Faulkner et al., 2014 [35]

Experimental

UK

av. 26 y/o

21–44 y/o (186)

• Coleslaw

• Reduced-fat vs. Standard

• Perceived appropriate portion size

• Perceived energy content

Norton et al., 2013 [36]

Experimental

UK

av. 24.3 y/o

18–60 y/o (87)

• Milk chocolatea

• Reduced-fat vs. no claim

• Perceived tastiness

• Experienced tastiness

Andrews et al., 2009 [37]

Experimental

US

18+ y/o (480)

• Chocolate

• Half-the-fat

• Half-the-calories vs. no claim

• Perceived healthfulness

Belei, et al., 2012

(study 1) [38]

Experimental

US

undergraduate students (109)

• Chocolatea

• Low-fat vs. Regular

• Food intake

Ebneter et al., 2013 [39]

Experimental

US

women

av. 20.86 y/o (175)

• M&M's.a

• Low-fat vs. Regular

• Perceived energy content

• Perceived healthfulness

Wansink & Chandon, 2006

(study 2) [40]

Experimental

US

av. 38 y/o (74)

• M&M's.

• Granola bara

• Low-fat vs. Regular

• Perceived appropriate portion size

• Perceived energy content

• Consumption guilt

• Weight status

Wansink & Chandon, 2006

(study 1) [40]

Real-word setting

US

18+ y/o (269)

• M&M's.a

• Low-fat vs. Regular

• Food intake

• Weight status

  1. aNo difference between the food products: the study used similar products with the same food composition
  2. bActual difference between the food products: the study used products with different food composition corresponding to the nutrition claim
  3. AU Australia, CA Canada, DE Germany, NL The Netherlands, UK The United Kingdom, US The United States of America, y/o years old, av. average, vs. versus