Table 2 Rural, Local Health Districts Adoption of and Recruitment for SIPsmartER
From: SIPsmartER delivered through rural, local health districts: adoption and implementation outcomes
| Â | Overall | District 1 | District 2 | District 3 | District 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Delivery Agents | |||||
 Number of participating delivery agents | 7 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
 Educator roles outside of SIPsmartER delivery | Health educator (n = 4) Health educator/ WIC nutritionist (n = 1) WIC nutritionist (n = 1) Public health nurse (n = 1) | Health educator/ WIC nutritionist (n = 1) | Health educator (n = 2) | Health educator (n = 1), WIC nutritionist (n = 1), Public health nurse (n = 1) | Health educator (n = 1) |
Medical Directors | |||||
 Districts with medical director changes during implementation | 3 (75%) | yesa,b | nob | yesa | yes |
 Timing of medical director change | – | Initial left: Mid-way through 1st cohort New started: Mid-way through 1st cohort | n/a | Initial left: Mid-way through 1st cohort New started: By end of 1st cohort | Initial left: Mid-way through 1st cohort New started: After end of 1st cohort |
Recruitment | |||||
 Number of cohorts expected | 12 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
 Number of cohorts recruited | 19 (173%) | 2 (100%) | 7 (175%) | 3 (150%) | 5 (125%) |
 Number of cohorts recruited by delivery agent | 17/19 (89%) | 2/2 (100%) | 7/7 (100%) | 3/3 (100%) | 3/5 (60%) |
 Number of cohorts enrolled | 12 (100%) | 2 (100%) | 4 (100%) | 3 (150%) | 3 (75%) |