Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of self-perception of weight status using medicalised words versus silhouettes

From: Is social exposure to obesity associated with weight status misperception? Assessing Australians ability to identify overweight and obesity

 

Medicalised Words

Silhouettes

Words vs Silhouettes

Matched

n (%)

Underestimated

n (%)

Overestimated

n (%)

p value

Matched

n (%)

Underestimated

n (%)

Overestimated

n (%)

p value

p value

Overall

528 (71.9)

148 (20.2)

58 (7.9)

469 (70.2)

84 (12.5)

116 (17.3)

0.450

Male

70 (64.2)

35 (32.1)

4 (3.7)

< 0.001

60 (60.6)

19 (19.2)

20 (20.2)

0.045

0.591

Female

455 (73.4)

111 (17.9)

54 (8.7)

407 (72.0)

65 (11.5)

93 (16.3)

0.602

Regional/Remote

342 (70.4)

102 (21.0)

42 (8.7)

0.369

313. (69.6)

51 (11.3)

86 (19.2)

0.110

0.712

Major City

184 (75.4)

44 (18.0)

16 (6.6)

155 (72.4)

31 (14.5)

28 (13.0)

0.468

HP

264 (73.7)

66 (18.4)

28 (7.8)

0.552

235 (71.6)

39 (11.9)

54 (16.3)

0.763

0.538

Non-HP

248 (70.9)

76 (21.7)

26 (7.4)

223 (69.5)

44 (13.7)

54 (16.8)

0.695

Underweight

5 (31.3)

0

11 (68.8)

< 0.001a

8 (50)

0

8 (50.0)

< 0.001a

0.280

Healthy weight

311 (85.2)

10 (2.7)

44 (12.1)

258 (79.1)

23 (7.1)

45 (13.8)

0.037

Overweight

133 (74.3)

43 (24.0)

3 (1.7)

60 (37.3)

39 (24.2)

62 (38.5)

< 0.001

Obese

79 (45.5)

95 (54.6)

0

143 (86.7)

22 (13.3)

0

< 0.001

  1. aMatched vs not matched