Skip to main content

Table 2 Regression analysis

From: The density of electronic gambling machines and area-level socioeconomic status in Finland: a country with a legal monopoly on gambling and a decentralised system of EGMs

 

Dependent variable

EGMs per 1000 inhabitants

Model (1)

Model (2)

Model (3)

Model (4)

Model (5)

Median income, 1000€

−0.137*** (0.009)

  

−0.125*** (0.012)

−0.064*** (0.013)

Unemployed, %

 

0.141*** (0.016)

 

−0.035 (0.020)

0.001 (0.019)

No primary education, %

  

0.128*** (0.011)

0.060*** (0.012)

0.035* (0.015)

Population density, 1000s per km2

    

−0.045 (0.045)

Jobs in area/ employed inhabitants * 100

    

0.009*** (0.001)

Mean age

    

0.107*** (0.021)

Constant

8.268*** (0.301)

1.622*** (0.245)

0.324 (0.300)

6.797*** (0.757)

−0.424 (1.175)

  1. Note: * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001