Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A qualitative study of health promotion in academy schools in England

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
8 Apr 2019 Submitted Original manuscript
26 May 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Kirven Addison
27 May 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jung-Yu Liao
27 Jun 2019 Author responded Author comments - Patricia Ewen Jessiman
Resubmission - Version 2
27 Jun 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Jul 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Kirven Addison
16 Jul 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jung-Yu Liao
1 Aug 2019 Author responded Author comments - Patricia Ewen Jessiman
Resubmission - Version 3
1 Aug 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
12 Aug 2019 Author responded Author comments - Patricia Ewen Jessiman
Resubmission - Version 4
12 Aug 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
14 Aug 2019 Author responded Author comments - Patricia Ewen Jessiman
Resubmission - Version 5
14 Aug 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
18 Aug 2019 Editorially accepted
28 Aug 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12889-019-7510-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement