Skip to main content

Table 3 Longitudinal association between woman’s income and past year experience of physical IPVa

From: Women’s income and risk of intimate partner violence: secondary findings from the MAISHA cluster randomised trial in North-Western Tanzania

 

Intervention arm (n = 313)

Control arm (n = 274)

Past year physical IPV at follow-up n/N (%)

Age-adjusted OR (95%CI)

aORb (95%CI)

Past year physical IPV at follow-up n/N (%)

Age-adjusted OR (95%CI)

aORb (95%CI)

Change in monthly income between baseline and follow-up

 Fallen 1+ quartile/stopped working

22/86 (26%)

17/77 (22%)

 Stayed in same quartile

16/96 (17%)

0.63 (0.30–1.32)

0.48 (0.19–1.22)

19/78 (24%)

1.18 (0.57–2.43)

1.04 (0.51–2.14)

 Increased 1+ quartile/started working

16/112 (14%)

0.52 (0.29–0.94)

0.39 (0.17–0.89)

18/99 (18%)

0.76 (0.38–1.51)

0.55 (0.25–1.23)

Change in financial contribution to household relative to husband between baseline and follow-up

 Was always lower/the same

37/195 (19%)

28/161 (17%)

 Was higher, now lower/same

5/33 (15%)

0.85 (0.28–2.54)

0.83 (0.23–2.98)

4/30 (13%)

0.93 (0.30–2.87)

0.81 (0.22–2.91)

 Was lower/same, now higher

5/45 (11%)

0.58 (0.25–1.30)

0.87 (0.37–2.05)

12/39 (31%)

2.80 (1.06–7.38)

4.16 (1.44–12.01)

 Always higher

8/40 (20%)

1.37 (0.64–2.93)

1.84 (0.65–5.25)

17/44 (39%)

4.46 (1.85–10.77)

4.76 (1.84–12.34)

  1. aAmong women married/living as married at baseline and follow-up
  2. bAdjusted for woman’s age, other income/financial contribution variable, partner’s age, baseline measure of outcome, woman’s education, partner’s education, relationship duration, and experience of household-level financial hardship in past year